• 
• 14%
• Used substantial repetitive phrases

328 of the 2,291 total reviews for this product use substantial repetitive phrases between them. These reviewers have rated this product an average of 5.0 while reviews without substantial repetitive phrases rated this product an average of 4.8. Based on our statistical modeling, the discrepancy in average rating between these two groups is significant enough to believe that the difference is not due to random chance, and may indicate that there are unnatural reviews.

Read more about our Phrase Repetition test.

• 23
• Reviews have been deleted

We discovered a total of 23 deleted Reviews for this product, with an average rating of 4.9. Even though deleted reviews don't affect the average rating, the fact that action was taken to delete reviews raises some red flags about the integrity of the reviews for the product as whole.

There are a few limitations to keep in mind regarding the Deleted Reviews test:

1. We don't have a magic ability to collect every single deleted review; we can only identify reviews as deleted if we collect them on one date and then notice they are no longer visible on a subsequent date.
2. We have no information on reviews that were never published in the first place.
3. We also don't know why these reviews were removed. It could be action from the platform, personal decision by the review author, part of an entire account closure, even some data error on our part, etc.

Read more about our Deleted Reviews test.

Show distribution of deleted reviews

Brand Repeaters

• 
• 45%
• Reviewed other products from this brand

1,041 of the 2,291 reviewers have reviewed other products for this brand. While this is more Brand Repeaters than we'd expect to see, the discrepancy in ratings between the Brand Repeaters and non-repeaters isn't significant enough to rule out the possibility of it being due to random chance.

Read more about our Brand Repeats test.

Take-Back Reviewers

• 
• 46%
• have previously deleted reviews

1,064 of the 2,291 reviewers have had at least one of their past reviews for another product deleted. While this is more Take-Back Reviewers than we'd expect to see, the discrepancy in ratings between the Take-Back Reviewers and reviewers who don't have any deleted reviews in their history isn't significant enough to rule out the possibility of it being due to random chance.

Read more about our Suspicious Reviewers test.

• 
• 33%
• Have an overrepresented word count

In the graph above, we can see the distribution of review word counts for this product and the expected distribution for this category. We see the following 1 group with a statistically significant greater concentration than what we'd expect to see:

• 6-15 words: 32.7% (Avg. rating: 4.9)

In total, we found that 749 reviews (or 33%) are within an overrepresented word count group. While this is more reviews from overrepresented word count groups than we'd expect to see, the discrepancy in ratings between reviews with overrepresented word groups and all other reviews isn’t significant enough to rule out the possibility of it being due to random chance.

Read more about our Word Count Comparison test.

• 
• 56%
• From reviewers with an overrepresented participation

We see the following 3 participation groups with a statistically significant greater concentration than what we'd expect to see:

• Reviewers with 1-5 Reviews: 10.2% (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• Reviewers with 6-15 Reviews: 25.1% (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• Reviewers with 16-30 Reviews: 20.9% (Avg. rating: 4.9)

In total, we found that 1286 reviewers (or 56%) are within an overrepresented participation group. This is an excessively high number of reviewers in overrepresented participation groups.

Read more about our Reviewer Participation test.

• 
• 4%
• Created over 17 days

We counted 2,291 reviews for this product over the span of 4,077 days, an average of 0.6 reviews per day. If these reviews were created randomly, there would be a 99.9% chance that we would see 4 or fewer reviews on any given day.

However, we see the following 17 days exceeding this threshold:

• 8 Reviews on Jul 18, 2019 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 8 Reviews on Jul 14, 2019 (Avg. rating: 4.9)
• 7 Reviews on Aug 10, 2020 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 6 Reviews on Jun 6, 2019 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 6 Reviews on Jun 20, 2019 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 6 Reviews on Jul 22, 2015 (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• 6 Reviews on May 2, 2018 (Avg. rating: 4.7)
• 5 Reviews on Aug 8, 2017 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 5 Reviews on May 1, 2018 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 5 Reviews on Apr 22, 2019 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 5 Reviews on Aug 25, 2019 (Avg. rating: 5.0)
• 5 Reviews on Nov 10, 2018 (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• 5 Reviews on Jun 26, 2019 (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• 5 Reviews on Jul 19, 2019 (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• 5 Reviews on Feb 26, 2020 (Avg. rating: 4.8)
• 5 Reviews on Jun 5, 2018 (Avg. rating: 4.6)
• 5 Reviews on Jun 14, 2017 (Avg. rating: 4.0)
Show All

In total, we found that 97 reviews were created on just 17 days. This is within an acceptable range and it does not appear to be significantly affecting the overall rating for this product.

Read more about our Rating Trend test.

• 
• 2%
• Unverified Purchases

44 of the 2,291 total reviews for this product are unverified purchases. This is within an acceptable range and it does not appear to be significantly affecting the overall rating for this product.

Unverified purchases may be the result of Kindle Unlimited readers, buyers who didn't pay full price, or reviewers who did not purchase the product at Amazon. Read more about our Unverified Purchases test.

• 
• 18%
• Substantial overlapping review history

417 of the 2,291 reviewers have substantial overlapping product review history. This is within an acceptable range and it does not appear to be significantly affecting the overall rating for this product.

Read more about our Overlapping Review History test.

The ease score is the average rating for all reviews that a given reviewer submits. The average ease score for reviewers of this product is 4.5, while the average ease score for reviewers in this category is 4.4. While this discrepancy is rather large, it is not quite large enough to rule out the possibility of it being due random chance.

On Oct 3, 2016, Amazon prohibited incentivized reviews, however we still test for them since there are still millions in our dataset.

• 
• 0%
• Admitted to receiving an incentive

We didn't detect any reviews that used language indicating they were incentivized.
Read more about our Incentivized Reviews test. Check out our study showing that Incentivized Reviewers are much more likely to leave a positive review.