Jump to content

Tommy

Administrators
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral
  1. Tommy

    May I refer to your site and reports in a blog?

    Hey Mark- Thanks for asking! You can use any of the info on the reports, but please don't add words that aren't there, such as "ReviewMeta Certified", "ReviewMeta Verified", or "Guaranteed Fake Review free" or anything of that nature that's not available on the report pages.
  2. Tommy

    That other reviews scoring site

    Interesting comparison here. Let's take a deeper look... Before we begin, it's important to keep in mind that both sites are estimates, and since I didn't create FakeSpot, anything I say about their analysis is just my guess - I don't know more about the inner workings of their site than any other visitor. (1) SKG Automatic Bread Machine 2LBhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/B071GKYPQ3Amazon: 363 reviews, 4.4 stars, rank 74%ReviewMeta: Fail, 157 reviews, 4.3 stars, rank 63%FakeSpot: Grade D, Adjusted rating 2.0 stars, 49% low quality reviews. For the ReviewMeta report, I'm pretty confident in it after taking a manual look. Looks like there was some suspicious activity which was detected and some of the reviews were de-valued. A product rating reduction of 4.4 => 4.3 isn't nothing, but it seems that the product has been able to generate a decent amount of trustworthy honest reviews over time (which seems to be quite common). Looking at the FS report, if I click on the "Trustwerty adjusted rating" it takes me to Trustwerty.com and shows that it's 2.3 stars. (It also prompts me to pay $10 to see the full report, which I'm not doing). FS also says "44.0% Low Quality Reviews Detected". If there's 363 reviews, that means they're estimating 160 Low Quality Reviews. Assuming every single one of these is a 5-star review, let's look how the review picture changes when we throw them out. 5-star: 293 => 133 4-star: 27 3-star: 11 2-star: 12 1-star: 20 Even if we throw out 160 5-star reviews, the average rating would only drop to 4.2/5. So something isn't quite adding up here. Even if you threw out every single one of the 293 5-star reviews, the average rating would only drop to a 2.6. And that's over 80% of the reviews! I strongly believe that you can't do anything beyond simply devaluing some reviews. The technology looks at reviews and has absolutely no way of knowing anything about the products themselves, so trying to further "punish" a product is a bit of an overstep in my opinion. The bottomline is this: It's unclear how FS is calculating their "trustwerty rating", but it's clear that they aren't using the same methodology that we are here at ReviewMeta. (2) Zojirushi BB-PAC20BA BB-PAC20 Home Bakery Virtuoso Breadmaker with Gluten Free Menu setting (Two selectable variations on the same product page)https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0067MQM48Amazon: 1,776 reviews, 4.5 stars, rank 77%ReviewMeta: Pass, 1,520 reviews, 4.5 stars, rank 82%FakeSpot: Grade D, Adjusted rating approx. 2.4 [approx. because by eye from filled-in stars], 44% low quality reviews. This is an example where FS doesn't like the reviews and RM does. What's tough about this is that RM shows all the work while FS doesn't, so it's hard to see exactly FS has decided to give it the rating that it does. Looking at the RM report, I don't see any major red flags, and since I didn't create FS, I can't say why they found issue with the reviews.
  3. Tommy

    That other reviews scoring site

    Hey Brec- Welcome to the forum! Yes, this is something I'm definitely interested in discussing. Would love to see your examples. One thing I noticed about the adjusted rating between RM and FS is that RM is ONLY using the existing reviews to recalculate an adjusted rating. So, for example, if a product has ONLY 100 5-star reviews and that's it, it will either get an adjusted rating of 5 stars OR an "insufficient reviews". We're not going to make up lower-star reviews. I've seen products on FS get an adjusted rating of 2 stars when there isn't a single review below 3 stars on that product. They are definitely using a different methodology, and it's not clear what it is.
  4. Hello Louis- Thanks for being the first to take a shot at the response dashboard. I went ahead and removed the marketing images from the bottom of your post as to comply with our rules. I'm assuming your product is this one? https://reviewmeta.com/amazon/B01G8FK7V2 The first thing I noticed is that the report was over a year old. I clicked the "Update" button (this is available to any visitor, not just me) and it refreshed the report and shows a PASS now. One thing that I find interesting is that there are 10 unverified reviews, all of which are perfect 5/5 star reviews, while the verified reviews average 4.3 stars. There's also three one hit wonder + unverified reviews from the following reviewers: https://www.amazon.com/gp/profile/amzn1.account.AELNM3YLIV6M7FA2OBP5Y3ZPHNWA?pldnSite=1 https://www.amazon.com/gp/profile/amzn1.account.AGVQJFAHDN4BAQH5AML77NWYZI2Q?pldnSite=1 https://www.amazon.com/gp/profile/amzn1.account.AEWNP7HHNZKNLZKCCZ427WMIHREA?pldnSite=1 All three of these users posted their only review (5-star unverified purchase review for your product) around the same time. Jun-18, Jun-20 and Jul-30 of 2016. This is what could have been causing the initial WARN but now that there's additional reviews, it could have been bumped up to a PASS. Again, I appreciate you going out on a leg and being the first to post a public response.
×

Important Information

Welcome to the ReviewMeta Forums! By viewing our site, you agree to our Terms of Use