Thermophore MaxHEAT Plus Moist Heating pad Size Petite 4" x 17" - Model 377
More product info
From Battle Creek
Refresh the report to view the most up-to-date data available:
Note: We only analyze "reviews" and ignore one-tap "ratings".
Report Card
Most Trusted Reviews
TRUST
- Verified Purchaser
- Easy Grader (avg. rating: 4.4)
Least Trusted Reviews
TRUST
- Unverified Purchaser
- Contains repetitive phrases (show)
- Overrepresented Participation (posted 5 Reviews)
- Critical Reviewer (avg. rating: 4.0)
Analysis Details
5 of the 122 total reviews for this product are unverified purchases. The unverified purchasers have rated this product an average of 3.0 while the verified purchasers have rated this product an average of 4.3. Based on our statistical modeling, the discrepancy in average rating between these two groups is significant enough to believe that the difference is not due to random chance, and may indicate that there are unnatural reviews.
Unverified purchases may be the result of Kindle Unlimited readers, buyers who didn't pay full price, or reviewers who did not purchase the product at Amazon. Read more about our Unverified Purchases test.
8% also reviewed:
Earth's Best Organic Stage 2 Baby Food,... by Earth's Best
7% also reviewed:
SenseLAB Tangerine Essential Oil - 100% Pure... by SENSELAB
7% also reviewed:
Thermophore MaxHeat Arthritis Pad Moist Heating... by Thermophore
4% also reviewed:
PAGE ONE Womens Winter Ribbed Beanie Crossed Cap... by PAGE ONE
3% also reviewed:
Thermophore Classic Heat Pack (Model 055)... by Thermophore
3% also reviewed:
Certified Refurbished Fire TV Stick with Alexa... by Amazon Renewed
3% also reviewed:
Amazon Essentials Men's Regular-Fit... by Amazon Essentials
3% also reviewed:
PAGE ONE Mens Slouchy Beanie Winter Warm... by PAGE ONE
from the same brand
14 of the 122 reviewers have substantial overlapping product review history. These reviewers have rated this product an average of 3.2 while the reviewers who have a more unique product review history rated this product an average of 4.3. Based on our statistical modeling, the discrepancy in average rating between these two groups is significant enough to believe that the difference is not due to random chance, and may indicate that there are unnatural reviews.
Take-Back Reviewers
43 of the 122 reviewers have had at least one of their past reviews for another product deleted. While this is more Take-Back Reviewers than we'd expect to see, it does not appear to have a significant impact on the overall rating.
(2.3/5)
(4.3/5)
(3.7/5)
(5.0/5)
(5.0/5)
(4.0/5)
(4.0/5)
(4.7/5)
(4.0/5)
(4.3/5)
29 of the 122 total reviews for this product use substantial repetitive phrases between them. This is an excessively large percentage which may indicate unnatural reviews.
-
- 57%
- From reviewers with an overrepresented participation
We see the following 2 participation groups with a statistically significant greater concentration than what we'd expect to see:In total, we found that 69 reviewers (or 57%) are within an overrepresented participation group. This is an excessively high number of reviewers in overrepresented participation groups.
-
- 0%
- Created on high-volume days
Read more about our Rating Trend test.
-
- 0%
- Have an overrepresented word count
Read more about our Word Count Comparison test.
4.3 Product's Average Ease Score
4.3 Category's Average Ease Score
Read more about our Reviewer Ease test.
Brand Repeaters
-
- 0%
- Admitted to receiving an incentive
Read more about our Incentivized Reviews test. Check out our study showing that Incentivized Reviewers are much more likely to leave a positive review.
- 0
- Reviews have been deleted
There are a few limitations to keep in mind regarding the Deleted Reviews test:
- We don't have a magic ability to collect every single deleted review; we can only identify reviews as deleted if we collect them on one date and then notice they are no longer visible on a subsequent date.
- We have no information on reviews that were never published in the first place.
- We also don't know why these reviews were removed. It could be action from the platform, personal decision by the review author, part of an entire account closure, even some data error on our part, etc.